Google Updates , A Test For Website's Legitimacy

Are you anticipating the new Look for engines update? What you think it will do?
As soon as we all observed the destruction created by the Look for engines penguin we all realized returning then that a fix will be included to this penguin really soon, and after the little update Penguin 1.1, we realized that Look for engines group are still acting that they have created an excellent job with the penguin and they will never confess of this error.

I am not discussing as SEOer, but when you want to update your support and create it better, you concentrate on your support not destructive your opponent. What Look for engines did in their first penguin update is battling SEO organizations, and eliminate sites that uses inexpensive link-building techniques, that we know most are bombarding. And Look for engines have the right to fresh up its search outcomes, and display better outcomes for sites that uses fresh organic link-building techniques.
But it was not the situation.
When the first penguin was targeted on charge, we predicted that the next penguin "penguin 2.0" will be about providing better outcomes on the greater position than those who changed the first charge.
For example for one key word the first penguin eliminated all the top 30 outcomes and pressed them way returning, but instead they introduced a really bad outcomes with low excellent. So we predicted that the new penguin 2.0 will be about solving the new outcomes in the top position. That will be the reasoning, when they always declare that their primary process is to carry the best material and excellent sites on top.
I think, reasoning and Look for engines do not go together.

So what will the next Look for engines update "Penguin 2.0" be about?
Matt Cutts declared this update saying it'll be "jarring and jolting". What the. it mean?
Well it's easy, they have a unclean walls, and they sensed they need to fresh that walls, so they washed it with the first penguin update, and when they completed the first fresh they checked out the walls and. wooops there are more dust.

So they had 2 options, to colour the walls with new shade concealing the dust and providing new fresh picture, or keep washing. And not amazing on how those people think they made the decision to keep washing, they know that they will end up artwork that walls again earlier or later, but they don't want to confess that they created an error in the first position. And they could colour this walls from the starting.
I am not trying to strike Look for engines, GOD prohibit we all need Look for engines and we all want them to be the best, because most of our internet organizations rely on them. But I am trying to provide my viewpoint here, they can create an criteria that put the best first, instead they are trying to eliminate what they think is bad, without looking at what continues to be after the reduction. Maybe I am wrong!
Learn more at arabian-affiliate.com.